I was interested in what Jane said at the end of this video. Did I hear her correctly? Did she say that Fox News did not have anyone covering the Libby trial? The sarcastic part of me is not surprised. The rational part of me is incredulous. How could they not be covering this? What could there definition of "news" be if the Libby trial does not justify coverage?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On a similar note, the CEO of News Corp, the owner of Faux News, admitted this:
Asked if his News Corp. managed to shape the agenda on the war in Iraq,
Murdoch said: "No, I don't think so. We tried." Asked by Rose for further
comment, he said: "We basically supported the Bush policy in the Middle
East...but we have been very critical of his execution." The News Corp. CEO also
once again signaled that he sees much more change ahead thanks to digital media.
"We're in the very early stages of it," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment